The Universe: Islamic View

The Islamic view toward the universe is an intellectual, scientific view that creates the human emotions and feelings toward the greatness of Allah the creator. It also creates emotions and feelings toward the smallness of the human being and his weakness in front of this universe, which leads to the necessity to submit to Allah (S.W.T.).
 
1. The universe as a whole is a creation of Allah that created it for a purpose. Playing was not the cause for creation.
Surat al Dukhan, Verses 38-39
"We have not created the heavens and the earth, and all that is between them, for mere play, We created them not except with truth, but most of the do not know."


Surat al Anbiya’, Verses 16-17
"We have not created the heavens and the earth and all that is between them for mere play. If We wanted to create aimless things, we would have done it if we were going to do (that)."


The holy Qur’an demands man to think and reflect upon the creation of Allah, to reach to the oneness of Allah and to submit exclusively to Allah. Allah (S.W.T.) says in
Surat A-Zummar, (Verses 62-63 & 67)
"Allah is the Creator of all things, and he is the Wakil, (Trustee, Dospose of affairs, Guardian, etc.) over all things. To Him belong the treasures of the heavens and the earth. And those who disbelieve in the Ayat, (proofs, signs, etc.) of Allah, such are they who will be the losers. They made not a just estimate of Allah such as is due to Him. And on the Day of Resurrection the earth, as a whole will be grasped by His fist and the heavens will be rolled up in His Right. Glorified be He, and High is He above all that they associate as partners with Him!"


There are important effects of this Islamic view toward universe upon Tarbiyah (upbringing):
1- The attachment of the Muslim to the creator of this universe and to the most noble goal in this life and that is the total submission to Allah.
2- Bringing the human being up with seriousness because the whole universe was created upon the truth and was created for a purpose and to a certain demise known only by Allah.

 
2. The universe is subjected to certain absolute laws that Allah (S.W.T.) made according to certain predestination prescribed by Allah.
Surat Yasin, (Verses 37-40)
"And a sign for them is the night, We withdraw there from the day, and behold, they are in darkness. And the sun runs on its fixed course for a term (appointed).  That is the Decree of the All-Mighty, the All-Knowing.  And the moon, We have measured for it mansions (to traverse) till it returns like the old dried curved date stalk. It is not for the sun to catch up with the moon, nor does the night outstrip the day. They all float, each in an orbit."

The fact that the sun and the moon are each in a well-defined orbit is all made according to universal laws that Allah created. Allah (S.W.T) says:

Surat al Hujur, (Verses 19-21)
"And the earth we made it unfolded and planted in it mountains and made some plants in it to make balanced and made in it your living and those whom you are not providing sustenance for. And there is nothing but we have its treasures and we do not release but with a well known portion."
Everything alive on earth has their share of sustenance well accounted for by Allah who does not release it but with a well defined portion.


And also Allah (S.W.T.) taught man reckoning, calculations from the alternations of the day and the night. Allah (S.W.T) says:

Surat Al-Isra’, (Verse 12)
"And we made the night and day two signs; we erased the sign of the night and made the sign of the day clear for you to make your living from the blessings of Allah, and to know the number of years and reckoning (calculations), and everything was well explained."


All this has a great and important effect upon Tarbiyah; the Qur’an raised the mind of the Muslim upon the fact that the occurrence of the same events is done according to fixed laws made by Allah (S.W.T.) and He (S.W.T.) is the one who can change it if He wants. Also, these laws of this universe and its events and its beings were released by Allah (S.W.T.) with a well known portion. This way, the Muslim mind is raised to be accurate and to base everything on a standard.
 
3. The universe is ruled and watched over by Allah (S.W.T.): Allah (S.W.T.), who made the laws of the universe, is still ruling it and watching over it.

Surat al Hajj, (Verse 65)
"And He withholds the sky from falling upon the earth except by His permission."


Surat Fatir, (Verse 41)
"Allah withholds the skies and the earth from crumbling, and if they crumble, who can hold them after Him, Indeed he is ever most Forbearing and Oft- forgiving."


The human, a tiny part of this universe, is also subjected in his life and death to the well defined ending of Allah. Allah (S.W.T.) says:

Surat al An’aam, (Verse 61)
"And he is the Irresistible, Supreme over his servants, and he sends to you guardians (angels) over you and when death comes to one of you, our messengers (angels) would take his soul and they never neglect their duty."


Also, Allah (S.W.T.) created social laws for man’s life, and sends messengers to enforce them, and torture some nations and perish others. Allah (S.W.T.) says:

Surat Al-Ra’ad, (Verse 11)
"Verily! Allah does not change the situation of a people as long they do not change their state of themselves. And if Allah wants to harm some people, no one can stop it and they will not find besides Him a protector."


Surat Al-Imran, (Verse 137)
"Many similar events happened before you, so walk over the earth and see the punishment of the disbelievers."

 
4. The whole universe is surrendered with obedience to Allah:
Surat al Baqarah, (Verse 116)
"For him is all what is in the skies and what is on earth; all are surrendered with obedience to Him."


Surat al Isra’, (Verse 44)
"The seven heavens glorify him, and so does the earth and what is in them, and there is nothing but glorifies Allah, but you do not comprehend their glorification."


This has a great effect on the Tarbiyah of man because all beings are obedient and submissive to their Lord. So, man should be the first to submit and obey Allah and to become a harmonious part of the whole universe participating in the glorification of Allah.
 
5. The whole universe is in the service of man:
Surat Luqman, (Verse 20)
"Do you not see that Allah made available for you all what is in the skies and what is in the earth, flooded you with many blessings known and unknown."


Surat Ibrahim, (Verses 32-34)
"Allah is the one who created the heavens and the earth and released from the sky water from which he made fruits as a sustenance for you, and made available for you the ships to float in the sea and made available for you the rivers, and made available for you the sun and the moon incessantly in motion and made available for you the night and the day, and gave you everything you asked for, and if you count the blessings of Allah, you will not be able to count them. Man is indeed oppressive and disbelieving."


Surat al Nahal, (Verses 12-18)
"And He made available for you the night and the day and the sun and the moon and the stars all obedient to him. Indeed, there are signs in this to people who have minds.  And what he spread for you on earth of different colors. Indeed, there is a great sign in this for people who remember, and He is the one who made available the sea from which you eat soft meat and make from it garments to wear. You see the ships sailing in it, and to make your living from His blessings and so you may thank Him, and planted in the earth mountains so that the earth will be stable and rivers and pathways so you may be guided, and signs and with stars they are guided, Is that who does not create like the one who does?!  Do you not remember, and if you count the bounties of Allah, you will not be able to count them. Allah is the Forgiving and the Compassionate."


All these verses and others in the holy Qur’an raise man to be grateful to Allah and to recognize His Care, His Mercy and His Greatness so he will be driven to thank Allah, glorify Him and submit to Him.
 
 I have forgotten where I got this article from... if anyone knows the source, please let me know so I can credit the author.  Thanks.  Uzma Mazhar
 

Placing Freud's 'The Interpretation of Dreams' into the Context of Islamic Dream Analysis (An Elementary Critique)

Author: Hafiz Abrar Ahmad

Dreams are an essential part of human life. People, regardless of any religion, want to be au fait with the interpretation of their dreams. In this regard, the dreamers may consult either Freudian system of interpretations or the Islamic system. The question, however, arises as to which system of dream-interpretation is more practicable in human life, the Islamic or Freudian? Freudian System is a man-made system based on Freud’s own experiences. The Islamic System, on the other hand, is based on divine sanctions and the laws, interpreted first by prophets and then by certain scholars as well. However, to answer such questions, it is indispensable to make a comparison of the two systems and thus reach some conclusion.

Freudian Hermeneutics:
That every dream has a sensual background was never the claim of Freud. His time to time affirmation that the more one is concerned with the solution of dreams, the more one is driven to recognize that the majority of the dreams of adults deal with sexual material and give expression to erotic wishes (1) cannot be generalized. Perhaps it became Freud’s fate to feel like Cassandra, whose message was constantly and seemingly willfully misinterpreted. And, to be very accurate, it was this sort of misrepresentation that impelled him to assert his ideas. At one place, he explains his position that:

‘The assertion that all dreams require a sexual interpretation, against which critics rage so incessantly, occurs nowhere in my Interpretation of Dreams …. But it is also true that many dreams which appear to be indifferent and which one would not regard as in any respect peculiar lead back on analysis to wishful impulses which are unmistakably sexual and often of an unexpected.’ (2) 

This, however, indubitably leads to another of his phenomena that a dream is a disguised and distorted expression of a repressed and forbidden wish. The Interpretation of Dreams, Freud divides the content of dreams into two categories, namely “manifest-content” and “latent-content”. What we remember of a dream is the manifest-content, what causes the dream is the latent, repressed and unconscious content. It implies that it is the manifest-content of a dream that actually expresses our repressed and forbidden wishes in the course of our dreams. And the latent-content of a dream is, in fact, what is stored in our unconscious from our near past. It was Freud’s general observation, and can be attested from our own dreams also, that most of the dreams originate from the most recent twenty-four hours of the dreamer. Yet he distinguished four specific ways in which a dream may originate:
1.       A recent and important fact of the dreamer’s emotional life is directly represented in the dream. Such dreams are very much self-explanatory and require no interpretation. Examples come mostly from the simple wish-fulfillment dreams of children.
2.       Several recent and important ideas are blended into a simple whole by the dream. In this case, an analysis of the dream, simply contingent upon that aspect of dream-work that Freud called ‘condensation’, is essential.
3.       One or a number of recent and important events in the dreamer’s emotional life may be represented in the dream by an equally recent but relatively apathetic memory. Deciphering such a dream entails what Freud called ‘displacement’.
4.       An important but long-past and buried memory or idea is represented in the dream by a recent and relatively indifferent impression. Such dreams are very frequent with the individuals whose emotional waking life is somewhat perplexed.

From the above perusal, one important fact that can be deduced is that a dream, according to Freudian Hermeneutics, has mainly two characteristics:
1. Wish-fulfillment;
2. Past links;
 
These two characteristics serve as a bridge between the latent-content and the phantasmagoria of manifest-content, and the mechanisms that serve to translate and distort the latent content into the manifest content were listed by Freud. He called them condensation, displacement, dramatization, symbolization and secondary elaboration.

Let us consider each of them in turn.
1.      Condensation
Under the heading of condensation, come the dreams (the manifest-content) in which one single idea stands for a great many associations which, in turn, lead to quite separate, although frequently overlapping, ideas in the latent content of the dream. In simple words, under this process, one recognizable idea or memory stands, in fact, for a number of previously unrecognizable, far more important and apparently irrelevant and unrelated ideas or memories. To this process, Freud gave a peculiar name, ‘over-determination’.

In his The Interpretation of Dreams, Freud gives many examples, in this regard, but the most suitable example rests with Frink in his Morbid Fears and Compulsions. Frink reports:
A young American woman dreamed that she was walking on Fifth Avenue with a friend, looking for a new hat. Finally she went in and bought one. This apparently trivial recollection was the total content of the manifest dream as remembered by the dreamer.

Association and analysis led to the following data:
The walk with the friend the previous day had actually taken place, and had indeed been along Fifth Avenue. There had however been no question of the purchase of a new hat. Moving on from this the dreamer said that in fact her husband had been ill in bed that day. The illness was only a trivial and transient one, but she had been worried by her private preoccupation with the possibility of her husband’s death. When her friend called, her husband, who had noticed her quietness and apparent gloom, had suggested that she and her friend should go out together to get out of the house for a bit. During their walk, the dreamer had found herself discussing a man whom she had known before her marriage. At this point her associations ceased. Frink asked her to go on, and eventually she said that this was a man with whom she had at one time thought she was in love. Frink asked her if she had ever considered marrying this man. She then laughed unhappily and said that he had never asked her, and that their financial and social positions had been so different that it would be fantastic even to dream of it. Despite this revelation, she was still unable to associate further to the idea of this man, and her next association concerned buying the hat. She then admitted that she was very partial to hats, and would like to have bought many, but in fact she and her husband could not afford this kind of expenditure. At this point, she suddenly remembered that the hat she had bought in the dream had been black hat. ‘It was a mourning hat….’, she added. This final detail began to make the whole dream clear.[2]

Freud himself is of the opinion that, during the course of interpretation, a previously omitted fragment of a dream frequently emerges, and the dreamer overtly admits that until then that fragment had been entirely forgotten:
This part of the dream which had been wrested from forgetfulness is always the most significant part. It lies on the shortest path to the solution of the dream, and it is for that very reason it was most exposed to the resistance….[3]

Frink interprets this dream as follows:
The day before the dream, the patient had feared that her husband might die. That night she dreamed that she had bought a mourning hat, which suggested a forbidden wish for her husband’s death, which had troubled her as an irrational anxiety in the daytime, and had then emerged as part of the latent content of the dream. In her waking life, she could not have afforded a new hat; in the dream she bought one without hesitation. This implied that she was better off, as indeed she would have been if she had married the man with whom she had first been in love. It emerged from the dream that in fact the woman had not only wished that she had married the first man, but had believed that despite the social difference which had seemed decisive to her, he too had wanted to marry her. Neither of them had ever got to the point of doing anything about it. The condensation in dream is of three different repressed wishes, all of them disguised, all of them forbidden by her real circumstances, to which consciously she was reconciled. She wished she were free to marry the first man, which would imply that she wanted her husband out of the way. She wished she were free to spend the money which this other marriage would have made available to her, and in spending it, she signified both the change in her marital and financial position, and the ending of her actual husband’s claims and need of her, by his death.[4]

In this dream, beneath one single idea or memory – that of buying a black (mourning) hat – lies the three-fold forbidden wish:
a)      For her husband’s death.
b)      For her to have married the man she first loved.
c)      For her to have plenty of money.
 
It implies that if her husband were dead and she had married her first love, the dream would have been a different one, or at least the hat she bought would not have been a mourning hat.

2.      Displacement
The term displacement, under Freudian Hermeneutics, can be defined as the removal of a significant and recognizable idea or memory from the manifest dream and its replacement by an initially incomprehensible symbolic idea or act. It implies that displacement is a process whereby the emotional charge is separated from its real object or content and attached to an entirely different one. One thing more that comes forth is that it is this displacement that makes an initially trivial dream appear emotionally significant, or conversely, an initially terrible or important dream appear trivial and insignificant. Moreover, it also indicates the involvement of symbolism in the manifest dream, which will be dealt with, later on, separately as a topic.


The dream already discussed under the heading of condensation is a good manifestation of displacement also, yet another case from Frink will provide an even more strong illustration. One of his patients was a girl suffering from an obsessional neurosis, who dreamed that she was in the presence of someone whom she could not identify, but who seemed important to her. She wanted to give him something and what she gave him was her comb. Once again this was all she could relate as the manifest content of the dream and, surprisingly enough, it seemed to mean nothing to her.

Analysis revealed that she, being a Jewess belonging to a strictly orthodox family, had wanted to marry a Protestant but could not as the rule against marrying out had prevented this, though she herself had believed that there was no real obstacle to such a mixed marriage. This forbidden wish of hers gave birth to the aforementioned dream where displacement had removed the idea of marrying the man from the manifest content, and replaced it by the initially incomprehensible symbolic act of giving him her comb. This displacement was, in fact, engendered by her remembrance of a phrase that she had heard in her childhood when she had been about to comb her hair with somebody else’s comb. The person had said to her, “Don’t do that, you will mix the breed”. Now, in her dream she had offered her comb to the man she wanted to marry, showing her urge to mix the breed, in fact to marry him and bear his children. It is exactly as though manifest dreams were smuggled messages in code, of the kind used in war to convey secret meanings to resistance movements within an enemy-occupied country.

3.         Dramatization
Dramatization in dreams, as Freud would suggest, can be defined as ‘the dramatic sequence of the dream linked with the unexpressed relationships which only interpretation can uncover’.


In other words, a dream is a series of phantasmagorias having no apparent relationships. Every picture bears a story but does not tell the story in terms of what it really means. The ideas, the feelings, the total sum of the dream remains without logic or explicit connexion. This is why nothing but free association and an understanding of symbolization can unfold the truth.

4.      Symbolization
Symbolization is an integral part of every human dream. When we say that every phantasmagoria of a dream bears a story in it but does not tell the story in terms of what it really means, we are, in fact, talking about the symbolism present in the dream. Freud’s own words about the symbolism of dreams were:

Symbolism is perhaps the most remarkable chapter of the history of dreams. In the first place, since symbols are stable translations, they realize to some extent the ideal of the ancient as well as of the popular interpretation of dreams, from which, with our technique, we had departed widely. They allow us in certain circumstances to interpret a dream without questioning the dreamer, who indeed would in any case have nothing to tell us about the symbol. If we are acquainted with the ordinary dream-symbols, and in addition with the dreamer’s personality, the circumstances in which he lives and the impressions which preceded the occurrence of the dream, we are often in a position to interpret a dream straightaway.[5]

In his The Interpretation of Dreams, most of the symbols presented by Freud are sexual.
Freud says about symbolism that this would arouse tremendous resistance and opposition in many of his hearers and readers. In one way he understood this, in another he still found it ambiguous and obscure that even his professional colleagues should be so outraged by what he had to say, whereas the existence of such symbolism in myths, religion, art and language was not only beyond all doubt but unreservedly accepted by all educated people.

5.      Secondary Elaboration
The manifest content of the dream is not in itself to be expected to make sense, to be coherent, or necessarily to illustrate directly any aspect of the latent content. The more the dream work succeeds in separating manifest and latent content, the more incomprehensible will the manifest dream be and, therefore, the more indispensable the reversal or undoing of the dream work becomes. The technique of this reversal is simply free association to each separate item of the dream, and the understanding of the specific symbolic language common in varying degree to all dreams. The starting point of this free association is simply what we call secondary elaboration. It is, in simple words, the outcome of the dreamer’s natural tendency on waking to make some sort of sense, to himself, of his recollection of the dream. Most of us, awakening from dreams, feel called upon to undertake some degree of secondary elaboration to make them capable of expression in words. It needs, however, to be reiterated that the deciphering of one part of the manifest dream by another part, as though the dreams were a coherent conception, will be sheer naivety.


Freud believes in the twofold purpose of dreams, physiological and psychological. The physiological purpose of a dream, Freud suggests, is the preservation of sleep. It lets feelings and emotions to be worked through which otherwise may disturb sleep. 

Psychologically, the purpose of a dream is to deplete the tensions of a repressed wish which otherwise would charge the dream with anxiety, making the process unsuccessful and keep the dreamer awake. It implies that as soon as the compromise between the repression and the return of the repressed material matures the dream becomes relatively tolerable to the sleeper and succeeds in protecting his sleep. At this stage, the question may arise as to what is the force that engenders this compromise? The answer to this is ‘the censor’. Then what is ‘the censor’?

The censor simply denotes the sum of the urges which prevail in the consciousness of a given individual, in so far as the said urges exercise an inhibitory function upon the urges opposed to them, which they drive back into the unconscious. It must, however, be noted that in Freud’s views this inhibitory function is only consciously exercised in very early life; it soon becomes automatic, then unconscious, and repression takes the place of suppression. Not only does the censor consign to the unconscious the urges which oppose it and which have penetrated into consciousness, but its inhibitory power is exercised even before their entry into consciousness. This is one of Freud’s most highly original concepts.[6]

The censor is then, in fact, the outcome of an individual’s upbringing. To put it differently, it is the upbringing of an individual, at his early age, that shapes his censor force and that is why two different persons may exhibit different degrees of resistance towards one particular dream. 

Islamic Hermeneutics:
While discussing Freudian Hermeneutics, we had concluded that it based on two primary characteristics, viz past link and unfulfilled desire (forbidden wish). Freud had, in fact, juxtaposed two different kinds of dreams into an amalgam; and therefore, he left it to the future researchers to decipher. Keeping these two features in the mind, let us proceed towards Islamic Hermeneutics.

Early Islamic scholars believed that dreams based on the dominant humour* of the dreamer. The one who is overwhelmed by melancholy sees in his dreams either graves, darkness, terrors or frights; the one infected by choler sees fire and lights; the one overwhelmed by phlegm sees rivers, waters, waves etc; and the one with blood sees beverages, air, cymbals and flutes. Yet, after acute research, it can be claimed that dreams are intrinsically of two kinds; the ‘fallacious’ dreams and the ‘veracious’ dreams. The former can be subdivided into seven more kinds and the latter into five.[7]

(A) Fallacious Dreams
Fallacious dreams are those which have very little to do with the real life of the dreamer, and therefore need no interpretation. They are only meant to tease the dreamer in one way or the other. Following are the main examples of such dreams:
 
i.            Monologue Dreams
In such dreams, the dreamer chats to his inner self and vice versa. Such a dream may be a corollary to some anxiety, unfulfilled desire, intricacy or bewilderment in the dreamer’s waking life. It may, also, be the dreamer’s inner evil force enticing him to commit some evil.


ii.            Wet Dreams
The common dreams that result in orgasm are termed as wet dreams. They, too, may be a sequel of some forbidden wish ripe in the unconscious of the dreamer and may provide an outlet to the unfulfilled desires in order to prevent frustration.


iii.            Pavur Nocturnus
They are satanic in nature and are fabricated by Satan or some phantom. Such dreams, though tormenting, never harm the dreamer. They only operate as evil forces to dissuade the dreamer from performing some specific good.


iv.            Sorcery Dreams
They are as troublesome as satanic dreams. They include the frightening dreams wherein the dreamer either experiences or confronts necromancy, theurgy and conjuring. In such dreams, the dreamer may be visiting some fairy-world and may see himself busy in merrymaking with fairies. The dreamer may, sometimes, find himself entangled in some magical trap.


v.            Devil-sighting Dreams
As is manifest from the heading per se, these dreams make the dreamer visualize the devil itself. They are also devised by Satan and the purpose of such dreams is only to indicate whether the dreamer, in his waking life, is following the devil’s will or not. If someone sees the devil gleeful in the dream, the connotation is not good, for to please the devil itself is impious and sacrilegious. On the contrary, if the devil is found in distress in the dream, it is a good sign, for the confounding of the devil contributes to the perfection of one’s moral self.


vi.            Humour Dreams
In such type of dreams, the working force is that of the dominant humour of the dreamer. He, as already mentioned in the beginning, dreams under the compulsion of his dominant humour. So, he dreams of either storms, tides, darkness, rivers, waves, cymbals or flutes, as the case may be.


vii.            Restoration Dreams
The dreams wherein the dreamer recalls his past, actually or symbolically, are categorized under the heading of Restoration Dreams. They are, in a way, the echo of the dreamer’s past emotional events and, as is obvious, are those described by Freud also.


(B) Veracious Dreams
Veracious dreams hinge not only upon the time of its occurrence but also upon the season and weather. The example, in this context, comes from the reverent hermeneutist Ibn-e-Sireen. Once a person came to him and said that he had dreamt of fire in the forest. Ibn-e-Sireen advised the dreamer to visit and explore that forest for there laid some hidden treasure for him. The dreamer followed his advice and soon found the treasure. After a certain span of time, another man came and narrated the same dream. But this time Ibn-e-Sireen advised the dreamer to evade visiting that forest for he may die there. Obsessed with love for wealth, the dreamer paid little heed to Ibn-e-Sireen’s advice and went to the forest. In the forest, some beast attacked him and tore him to pieces.  At the wonderment of his companions, Ibn-e-Sireen explained that the first dreamer had dreamt of fire in the winter and fire in the winter is comfort while the latter had dreamt it in the summer and fire in the summer is discomfort. All this betrays that two similar dreams may give two different interpretations, depending on the nature of the dreamer, time and season.


Muslim Hermeneutists are of the opinion that veracious dreams mainly acquire three parts of the daily twenty-four hours [8]:
a) The hours immediately followed by aurora;
b) The hours after the sunrise;
c) The hours of nap at noon;


It is, however, worth quoting that the most unreliable dreams are those dreamt in utter cold and rain. Moreover, a veracious dream does not require a dreamer to be necessarily a Muslim and adult. It may even come to a non-Muslim as well as a non-adult. In former case, the dream of the non-Muslim Pharaoh in the era of Prophet Joseph (AI) is evident:
And the king said: Lo! I saw in a dream seven fat kine which seven lean were eating, and seven green ears of corn and other (seven) dry. O notables! Expound for me my vision, if ye can interpret dreams [1] (Surah Yousaf, 43).

As for the dream of a non-adult, that of Prophet Joseph himself, when he was a child, suffices:
When Joseph said unto his father: O my father! Lo! I saw in a dream eleven planets and the sun and the moon, I saw them prostrating themselves unto me (Ibid., 4) 

Though the proper interpretation of such dreams, however, requires a vast Islamic knowledge, there are some parameters that can tell us about the main characteristics of a successful hermeneutist by Islamic standards. These characteristics can be enumerated as follows:
i)          He should be well versed in the discipline of Quranic Hermeneutics (Tabeer);
ii)          He should be well versed in Hadith Hermeneutics (Tabeer);
iii)         He should have a high level mastery of Arabic language – its syntactic and paradigmatic rules, its idioms, comprehensions etc.
iv)         He should be a devoutly true person in his daily life.
v)          He should be aware of the interpretations made by the reverent Muslim hermeneutists of different dreams in the past, as precedents. [9]


These are the major, though not only, characteristics of an interpreter. Moreover, a righteous and sincere interpreter always tries to interpret a dream in a positive way and tries his level best to eschew the dark side of a dream, for, according to the saying of the Holy Prophet (PBUH), a dream is always contingent upon its interpretation.

It needs to be divulged here that in the parameters of the aforementioned characteristics (of the interpreter as well as the time of dreams) only repose and veracious dreams are interpreted by Muslim hermeneutists, since these have the capability of interpretation because they prophesy and effect future events. As far as the fallacious dreams are concerned, they have nothing to envisage for the future and possess no utility for interpretative systems.

i. Evident Dreams
They are incontrovertibly true dreams and are said to be the forty-seventh part of prophethood. They come directly from God without any intermediary. A very telling example of such dreams can be quoted from Quran itself:

Allah hath fulfilled the vision for His messenger in very truth. Ye shall indeed enter the Inviolable Place of Worship, if Allah will, secure, (having your hair) shaven and cut, not fearing. But He knoweth that which ye know not, and hath given you a near victory beforehand (Surah al-Fatah, 27).

ii. Glad-tidings
In such dreams, the dreamer visualizes God, the prophets, some religious scholar or his own righteous forefathers. Such dream is, in fact, a prophesy of some future event and the event may be a good as well as bad one. Thus it may be even a warning from the Creator, His messenger or some other source and is mostly symbolic in nature. This is the type of dream about which the beloved wife of the prophet, Hazrat Ayesha (GBH), said that in his early days of prophethood, the prophet (PBUH) got inspiration from God through dreams.

iii. Inspirational Dreams
A dreamer may, sometimes, get inspiration from the Dream-Angel in some particular matter. The angel advises him in the matter by quoting some examples. These examples may be from Quran as well as from other divine books, depending on the mental disposition of the dreamer. If the dreamer, the angel thinks, is not capable of deducing any idea from the aforesaid sources, the examples are given from daily life wisdom. 


iv. Symbolic Dreams
Akin to the Inspirational Dreams, these dreams, too, are devised by spirits (the angels). Yet, they are different in that these dreams may be from any type of angel, not necessarily from the Dream-Angel, and they warn the dreamer symbolically of some future mishap. For instance, if an angel warns someone in his dream that his wife intends to poison him through one of his friends, it would imply that his wife has been cuckolding him and has indulged in fornication with that friend.


v. Paradoxical Dreams
A paradoxical dream always bears opposite meaning and only an expert hermeneutist can decipher its interpretation. It sometimes presents a juxtaposition of good and evil and the dominance of one of them leads to its interpretation. For example, if someone dreams that he is playing a trumpet in a mosque, it portends that he would confess his sins and would lead a religious life in the future. Contrary to this, if someone dreams that he is reciting Quran in the lavatory, it presages that in his future, the dreamer would lead a sinful life.

vi. Consultation Dream (Istikhara)
Besides the kinds enumerated above, there is a very unique type of dream in Islamic dream-theory which exists nowhere else. This type of dream may be named as ‘Consultation Dream’. The Consultation Dream is an Islamic way of seeking advice from Allah in some particular matter. The seeker offers two raka’ats prayer and invokes Allah for an advice in the matter he wants. Then he goes to sleep with the idea in his mind that he would be guided by Allah in the dream. In his dream, he is given some right direction in the matter which he follows after he awakes. This method of seeking advice of Allah was taught by the Prophet himself to his companions and cannot, therefore, be gainsaid.


All this attests that Islamic hermeneutics covers a wide range of dreams and that it gives the dreamers an accurate understanding of their dreams – fallacious as well as veracious. That is why Muslims rarely fear from anxiety dreams because an anxiety dream, as Freud would name it, is of no significance according to the Islamic hermeneutics and Muslims, therefore, feel no need to ponder over its interpretation. To the veracious dreams, they, however, not only pay attention but also interpret them according to the Islamic interpretative system and thus escape any sort of mental perplexity.  

Conclusion
Being irreligious, and especially a non-Muslim, Freud had very little knowledge of the dream-theory propounded by different religions. Though his Interpretation of Dreams presents an unbiased and almost unerring analysis of dreams, it includes only a few types of dreams. It gives us an amalgam of different kinds of fallacious dreams while totally ignores the veracious dreams because veracious dreams have almost nothing to do with one’s psyche; and were, therefore, totally unknown to psychologists like Freud.  Freud amalgamates, in his book, the concepts of wet dreams, restoration-dreams, humour-dreams and monologue-dreams and holds that there are two characteristics of these dreams, past-link and wish fulfillment. To the sorcery–dreams, pavur nocturnus and devil-sighting dreams, collectively, he gives the name of anxiety-dreams


Since the future is more important than the past of a dreamer, he would definitely prefer Islamic Hermeneutics in order to know about his future. Yet, there is another feature of Islamic Hermeneutics, the Consultation Dream, which makes it more comprehensive than Freudian Hermeneutics.

Finally, in conclusion, one could say that (a) Freudian Hermeneutics is the product of the researches/studies of one individual, in the Western context, in the ‘Modern’ post-Renaissance period; whereas (b) Islamic Hermeneutics represents a divinely revealed system incorporating the entire structure of human existence in this world and the next, which is in itself detailed, complete and traditionally active since many centuries in various parts of the Islamic world.

References
Quran Translation by M. Marmaduke Pickthall, ed. Karachi, 1373 A.H (1953-54 AD).

1.     Sigmund Freud. The Interpretation of Dreams. (London: Hogarth Press, n.d.) Vol. IV of the Standard Edition of the Complete Works of Freud, p.397.
2.     Ronald Dalbiez. Psychoanalytical Method and the Doctrine of Freud (London: Longmans, 1941) Vol. I, p.77.
3.     Ibid, p.78.
4.     Ibid, p.78-9.
5.     Sigmund Freud. Introductory Lectures on Psychoanalysis. (London: Hogarth Press, n.d.) Vol. XV of the Standard Edition of the Complete Works of Freud, p.151.
6.     Dalbiez, p.52-4
7.     Abdul Ghani Nabulsi. Ta’teer-ul-anaam fi Ta’beer-ul-Manaam. P.3.
8.     Abdul Ghani Nabulsi. P.5.
9.     Ibid, p. 6-8.
 
Source: http://www.hssrd.org/journal/fallsummer2003-2004/english/dreamanalysis.htm
Copyrights © 2001-2004 | All rights reserved

Conflict Management

The SALAM Model
The SNT Formula

Author: Dr. Iqbal Unus
Principal Associate at Education, Training and Research Associates (ETR)
Director of IIFTIHAR-USA

 
As Muslims who are aspiring to become a model Muslim community, one of the things that frustrate us is that so often we tend to differ, disagree and dispute with one another, and in the process sometimes dismember our relationships and our groups. It is not that we do not hear the words of Allah that we are One Ummah, Ummatun Wahidah, nor is it that we do not hear the words of the Prophet (saw) that all Muslims are like one body.
Our problem is probably that we may be focusing on solving the wrong problem. Instead of being frustrated by the presence of dispute, disagreement, difference, or any combination of those, we should be focusing on how we deal with them when they occur. This is what I hope to discuss in a brief way as a way of reminding myself and all of us of our responsibility in this matter.

I use the word CONFLICT to refer to all kinds of disputes or differences in thinking or action between individuals or between groups of individuals.

We must first recognize that no group of people is free of conflict. That is the nature of human beings and societies. We do a disservice by insisting on an absence of conflict.

Allah SWT created us different in many ways: The Qur'an says:
"If your Lord had so willed, He would have made mankind one people, but they will not cease to differ, except those on whom your Lord and Sustainer has bestowed His mercy, and for this did He create them." [11:118-9]

Instead, we should look at conflict in a positive way. It can be good for our collective social health. Conflict can be good because it can help bring about necessary changes in a situation, and can even lead to good decision making. We lose much by attempting to eliminate conflict. We gain much by managing it in order to benefit from it.
Rather than suppressing or avoiding it, we should respond to conflict methodically so that it contributes to the group's success. Let us analyze the nature of conflict a little further.

The Nature of Conflict
Conflict can be functional or dysfunctional, and occasional or chronic.
  • Conflict is functional when it improves the group's performance by forcing examination of basic issues and identifying new opportunities.
  • Conflict is dysfunctional when it hinders and prevents the group's goals from being achieved.
  • Conflict is occasional when it is the exception, not the rule in the individual's or the group's behavior.
  • Conflict is chronic when individuals or groups routinely differ in their approaches.
Overall, conflict that is dysfunctional and chronic is undesirable, whereas conflict that is functional and occasional is not only acceptable and normal, but functional and occasional conflict is even desirable.
A healthy tension within a group, caused by conflict, is desirable for success. The companions of the Prophet (saw) experienced functional and occasional conflict.

For example, upon the death of the Prophet (saw), Umar RA insisted that the Messenger of Allah did not die, and threatened to punish those who said so, until Abu Bakr RA appeared on the scene and recited the verse of the Qur'an that began: "Muhammad is no more than a Messenger...." [3:144]

The companions differed on where to bury the Prophet (saw). They had conflict of opinions about who should be the successor of the Prophet (saw), raising several questions, like: should the successor be from the Ansars or the Muhajireen; should it be one person or a group of persons, should he given the same authority as the Prophet had as judge and leader or less or different?

Sayyidina Umar and Sayyidina Abu Bakr had conflicting opinions on the permissibility of fighting those who withheld zakah.

Now, conflict may sound like a strong word to some; they may prefer use of words like disagreement or difference of opinion. Whatever word you choose, the nature of the phenomenon remains the same. I will use the word conflict, recognizing that some may disagree with me.

Conflict may arise on matters of limited significance like where to go for dinner or on matters of great significance like the results of the supreme sacrifice of millions of Muslims on the battlefields of Afghanistan. In Afghanistan, one of the most glorious chapters in contemporary Muslim history is in danger of becoming a messy footnote.
Chronic conflict occurs when individuals or organizations routinely differ in their approaches, expectations or views in matters that have an impact on the parties involved. These differences cause tensions and hard feelings whose intensity increases as the significance of the matters under consideration does.

Conflict management cannot be done in isolation. Conflict has a context and this context must be understood by all concerned.

A confrontational approach to conflict management forces people to take sides. If this occurs early in the conflict resolution process, the chances of arriving at an acceptable solution diminish greatly. To manage and possibly resolve a conflict, start by not taking sides. Keep an open mind. Encourage the other side to do the same.
Chronic conflict is usually caused by bad systems, not bad people. It is a situation that recurs time after time and often even when the parties to the conflict are no longer the same as before.

Chronic conflict is a product of - for example - misunderstood instructions, mismatched objectives, misdirected communication, mishandled decisions, etc. Individuals and groups in such situations become defensive even though they may themselves be victims of a bad system of policies and procedures that govern their interaction. Properly understood instruction, clearly matched objectives, well-directed communication, and correctly handled decision can create a system that minimizes conflict.

Occasional conflict - as opposed to chronic conflict - may require the leader or manager to focus on specific causes, often of personnel nature. However, new circumstances may produce new avenues for occasional conflict. The right approach for dealing with such a situation is to create a culture of acceptance and mutual respect for one another-within the bounds of right and wrong. Occasional conflict is an acceptable risk we take when we work together. 

Causes of Conflict
1. Differences in Goals
One cause of conflict is the difference in goals espoused by the parties in conflict. For example, two groups of people championing the same policy may be doing so for different reasons. Group A wants to expand the community center so that it can organize larger social functions, while Group B want to do the same in order to expand the library and reading room. They are both involved in fund raising, space planning, designing, and so on but each step they come into conflict because each group offers solutions that respond to what it thinks the purpose of the extension is.


2. Interdependence
The interdependence of two individuals or groups can also lead to conflict. For example, one group feels constrained in doing what it feels it must because it is tied to actions and approvals of the other group. One individual or group may think the other is moving too slow or too erratically to work with. Each of the two may be independently capable of achieving much but interdependently they are in conflict. There are several types of interdependence:

  • Pooled
    Pooled interdependence comes into play when the individual or the group acts as a part of a larger group. The ability to work together, to build consensus, and to support one another become important. The lack of this ability becomes a source of conflict when each individual starts viewing himself /herself as being totally autonomous.
  • Sequential
    Sequential interdependence comes into play when the work of one individual or group must later be reviewed approved or critiqued by another. The principle sources of conflict in sequential interdependence come from variance in expectations of what was to be achieved or how the task was to be carried out.
  • Reciprocal
    Conflict in this type of interdependence comes from misunderstanding of mutual responsibilities and relationships. For example, a staff member works through a holiday on the condition that a fellow employee will do his work on another day, so he can take that day off. If the other employee fails to do so, the reciprocal interdependence is strained and conflict emerges.

3. Perceptions
Conflict can be caused by a difference of perception between parties in conflict. One may perceive a situation or circumstance differently from the other. Group status and time are two factors perceived differently by different people.

  • Varying Perceptions of Group Status
    two or more individuals or groups in conflict may see their individual positions as different in terms of their rights and privileges. One may consider its status to be higher than the others and expect concessions or rewards merely on the basis of its self-perceived status.
  • Differences in Time Perspectives
    Differing understanding of what is meant by a certain time variable can be a source of conflict. For example, the parties in conflict can derive a variety of meanings from qualifications like "early," or "late," or "timely." A "short-term" commitment can be longer than a "long-term" commitment to other people or even to the same people in other circumstances.

Patterns of Conflict
Conflict develops and grows in a certain way. We will examine two instances of conflict in early Muslim history to observe the underlying pattern of conflict. The first incidence is the case of land distribution after the conquest of Iraq in the days of 'Umar (RA). The other incidence is that of the conflict between 'All (RA) and Mu'awiya (RA) regarding succession following the death of 'Uthman (RA).

1. Distribution of Land
A crisis emerges
After Muslim armies had entered Iraq as victors, the responsibility to decide if and how to divide the conquered land fell on the khalifah, 'Umar ibn al-Khattab (RA). Opinions were divided on the issue and Muslims were in conflict with one another.

The disagreement escalates.
On the one hand, the army commanders thought that the land should be divided and distributed. For example, a senior companion `Abdur Rahman ibn `Awf also favored distribution. `Uthman, `Ali and `Umar (RA) thought that the land should not be distributed but left with the original cultivators.

Confrontation occupies the center of attention.
A general assembly was called. It included all Muhajireen, and five representatives each from Aws and Khazraj tribes.

Crisis deepens.
The general assembly discussed the matter for several days. The crisis became prolonged and complicated. Further crisis is resorted to.

The conflict is resolved.
`Umar (RA) one day referred to the Qur'anic verse that concluded with the words "...those who come after them." The assembly was convinced when `Umar (RA) said: "How, then, can I distribute it amongst you and leave those who come afterwards without any share?" Thus, the conflict was resolved by resorting to an acceptable authority.
 
2. Succession of Khilafah
The crisis emerges.
`Uthman (RA)'s assassination resulted in a deep division among people who demanded that the new Khalifah, `Ali ibn Talib (RA) punish the assassins and those who favored the conciliatory approach of the Khalifah. Mu`awaiya (RA) refused to accept the leadership of `Ali (RA).

The conflict escalates.
`Ali (RA) replaced, only with partial success, governors appointed by the previous Khalifah, while refusing to accede to the demands that the those who murdered `Uthman be punished. On the other hand, Mu`awiya (RA) continued to seek subjugation of tribes through persuasion or fore, in defiance of the Khalifah.

Confrontation occupies the center of attention.
`Ali (RA) sent a letter to Mu`awiya (RA) asking him to submit to his leadership. Mu'awiya refused. The Khalifah sent an army to subdue him. The two armies faced each other for three months while concerned people on either side continued to attempt a settlement. A truce lasted an additional month before it broke out into an all out war. There was much bloodshed, but no victor. The two leaders continued to exhort their followers against the other.

The crisis deepens.
Finally, it was agreed that the matter of the appointment of the Khalifah be left to the decision of two referees, Abu Musa from `Ali (RA)'s side and `Amr ibn al-`As from the other side. After six months the referees met and after much discussion agreed to the solution that both the contenders be deposed and then people be allowed to choose whomever they wish to. After Abu Musa announced the withdrawal of the `Ali and Mu`awiya, `Amr announced that he accepts `Ali’s withdrawal but confirms Mu`awiya's claim to the Khilafah! The schism widened further.

Conflict is resolved.
With no solution in sight, a group of Muslims decided that the struggle would end only with the assassination of `Ali (RA), Mu`awiya (RA) and `Amr (RA). They succeeded only in killing `Ali (RA), enabling Mu`awiya to become the undisputed ruler. From a shortsighted point of view, the conflict was resolved by resorting to brute force. From a long-term perspective, the apparent resolution eventually led to a profound schism in the Muslim Ummah.
 
The Do's and Don’ts of Conflict
Do
1. Do assume that everybody is doing the best that he or she can do. Everybody is behaving in ways that make sense to him or herself.
2. Do accept that most conflicts are the result of bad systems and not bad people.
3. Do allow that often conflicts arise when present systems do not allow people to get what they need from each other.

Don't
1. Do not assume that the 'right' answer has already been discovered and is held by one of the parties involved in the conflict.
2. Do not assume that the-truth of a particular position is related to the force or eloquence with which it is presented, the number of people who hold that position, the title of the person who espouses it, or other circumstances that are irrelevant to the merit of the position itself.
3. Do not go for 'winning,' 'being right,'- and 'having the answer,' rather than being willing to negotiate and seek alternatives.
4. Do not assume that people rather than systems are at fault.
5. Do not assume that others' positions or behaviors are unreasonable.
6. Do not assume that resolution will necessarily create winners and losers.
 
The S-A-L-A-M Model
It is not the purpose of this booklet to talk about the theory of conflict - on why and how it occurs - but to point out how we can handle it to our advantage. For this purpose, I draw your attention to a model which I call the SALAM model of conflict management.

The English acronym SALAM is a transliterated version of the corresponding Islamic terms. I want to use the letters of SALAM to refer to a process of dealing with conflict.

The SALAM model points to a systematic way of approaching the conflict and moving towards a fair resolution, assuming of course that all parties to the conflict want to reach a fair conclusion.

S = stating the conflicting view
A = agreeing that a conflict exists
L = listening for and learning the difference
A = advising one another
M = minimizing areas of disagreement that could lead to aggression or withdrawal.


The first letter S stands for stating the conflicting view. We should not assume that we already know what the nature or content of the conflict is. Let it be stated what it is that we are in conflict about. The Qur'an advises us not to act on what we do not know.

In Sûrah Al Isra: "And pursue not that of which you have no knowledge; for every act of hearing or of seeing or of (feeling in) the heart will be inquired into (on the Day of Reckoning)." [17:36] In Sûrah Al Najm: "But they have no knowledge therein. They follow nothing but conjecture; and conjecture avails nothing against the truth." [53:28]
Once what is in conflict is clearly stated - without agreement or disagreement, it is possible to relate it to the conflicting parties' purposes. This will establish what is at stake and how critical is the disagreement. Some conflict might be resolved just by stating the parameters of conflict clearly, because one party or the other might find that it can live with the situation without trying to change it.
Therefore, S stands for stating the conflicting view.

The second letter A stands for agreeing that a conflict exists, again without making any judgment.
At this stage, we must detach issues from personalities. One way to do that is, when possible, let each side state the other side's position as fairly as it can. This enables them both to focus on issue, not persons.
The third letter L stands for listening for and learning the difference. Of course, that is the tough part.

Most of the time, we listen not to learn but to respond when our turn comes. Here we must turn to the essence of the Islamic principles of shura, by focusing on the issues. The two parties should move to a higher level by consulting with one another on how to attack the problem between them. Through this exercise of shura, they direct their mutual resources of creativity, experience, wisdom, etc. to attack the problem, not one another.
As far as shura is concerned, there is probably no other Islamic concept that is talked about as much as and practiced as little as shura. Therefore, I will not spend more time discussing what shura is.

However, within the context of avoiding conflict, one must stress the pro-active nature of shura. When the Prophet received the news about Abu Sufyan's caravan before the Battle of Badr, he consulted the members of his expedition. Sayiddina Abu Bakr and Sayyidina Umar spoke and then al Miqdad ibn 'Amr spoke, and then there was a long silence. The Prophet (saw) asked for advice. It seemed he was anxious to hear the Ansar's view because he had made a pledge with at al `Aqabah.

Then Sa'd ibn Mua'dh, their leaders, addressed the Prophet (saw) asking the Prophet (saw) if he was seeking to hear their views, and the Prophet (saw) confirmed that indeed he was. This anecdote stresses the pro-active nature of shura, the idea the one has to invite and seek shura, not simply engage in it because it is forced by circumstances.

Of course at this stage, we must examine the guidelines of Shariah with respect to the issues at hand. This should also be a mutual effort, to make the Shariah - in a sense - an unbiased arbitrator.

The fourth letter A stand for advising one another. This is a stage where compromises begin to take shape. We advise one another in the Islamic manner of nasîha, recognizing that the advisor is not always right. Two things are important here.

First: we move to common ground by proposing action that meets the principal needs of the other party while enabling us to reach our goals.

Second: we offer to help carry out whatever is agreed upon. Again, we are talking about a pro-active mode of behavior. It requires a continual monitoring of actions and prompt evaluative response to them.
We all know the very famous hadith of the Prophet (saw) related by Muslim on the authority of Abu Ruqayya Tamim ibn Aus ad-Dari (ra): The Prophet (saw) said: Religion is good advice. We said: To whom? He said: To Allah and His Book, and His Messenger, and to the leaders of the Muslims and their common folk.
We see that the Prophet (saw) extended the principle of nasîha to every one from the top to the bottom, from the leaders to the common folks. Thus the giving or receiving of nasîha is not restricted to one group of the other but is a general operational principle, specially when we study this hadith with the other famous one: A believer is a mirror to his brother.

The last letter M stands for minimizing areas of disagreement that could lead to aggression or withdrawal.
We do not want the other party to become an aggressor because they did not get what they wanted. In most situations, we also do not want the other party to withdraw from us. In most situations, this will be only a short-lived resolution of the conflict, until the other party feels strong enough to challenge the resolution.
Therefore, we want to seek agreement in as many aspects of the conflict as possible, minimizing those aspects in which either party has to yield its position. We recognize that conflict is unavoidable; and that it is even desirable to have functional and occasional conflict.

When two people always agree with one another, one of them is redundant.
 
The S-N-T Formula
There are ways to keep conflict functional and occasional, and avoid the emergence of dysfunctional and chronic conflict. This can be achieved by adopting a mode of behavior that I call the S-N-T formula.
Those of you need who need crutches to remember things - as I do - can make a mental note that S-N-T is the English word SAINT without the vowels.

S = Shura (Consultation)
N = Naseeha (Advice)
T = Ta'wun (Co-operation)


As far as shura is concerned, we have already discussed it above. However, within the context of avoiding conflict, one must stress the pro-active nature of shura, the idea that one has to invite and seek shura, not simply engage in it because it is forced by circumstances. The case of decision making before the Battle of Badr quoted earlier is illustrative of this point.

If we consult others in a pro-active way, seeking shura before crises emerge, differing points of view are brought into focus well before positions harden, and those consulted are likely to be supportive and accommodating even if things do not go their way entirely.

Nasîha is the second element in the S-N-T formula. Again, we are talking about a pro-active mode of behavior. It requires a continual monitoring of actions and prompt evaluative response to them.
We have seen that in the famous hadith "Religion is advice..." the Prophet (saw) extended the principle of nasîha to every one from the top to the bottom, from the leaders to the common folks, as exemplified in the two hadiths quoted earlier. Nasîha is not a passive mode of behavior. It requires an active monitoring of actions and prompt evaluative response to them. It calls for acting on the hadith of the Prophet (saw) "A believer is a mirror to his brother."

Like consultation, giving and receiving advice is also a prophetic tradition. The Qur'an attributes this quality of character to many prophets' including Shuayb AS, Yunus AS, Hud AS, and Prophet Muhammad SAW himself. When parties that could be in a conflict engage in a give and take of sincere advice as a normal mode of inter-personal and inter-group behavior, the potential of conflict is minimized. This happens because the parties involved are able to correct one another’s views and action before they become a source of conflict.

The third element of the S-N-T formula is Ta'wun, that is cooperation. The Qur'an advise Muslims to cooperate with one another. Thus the Muslim way of doing things should be in cooperation, but within the envelope which the Qur'an defines by saying: "Cooperate with one another in goodness and piety; and do not cooperate with one another in sin and transgression." This attitude of practicing ta'wun in a discrete way forces one to come to grips with what is goodness and piety and what is sin and transgression. And this coming to grips with issues in a pro-active way leads to reduced incidence of conflict that could be dysfunctional or chronic.

Thus if one were to adopt the S-N-T formula, that is shura, nasîha and ta'wun, as a mode of inter-personal or inter-group and intra-group behavior, one's effort will be less diminished by avoidable conflict.


reprinted in www.crescentlife.com with permission from the author.
You may reach Dr. Unus by e-mail at: Iqbalunus@aol.com
Office: (703) 779-7477, ext 403
Fax: (703) 779-7999

April 10, 1998
Pre-Publication Draft for limited circulation. Unauthorized copying prohibited.  This booklet was written while Dr. Iqbal Unus was the Director of the Human Resource Development Department of the International Institute of Islamic Thought, USA

Toward a Concept of Islamic Personality

Author: Abdul-Lateef Abdullah 

Abstract
This paper seeks to advance an Islamic notion of the concept of human personality. It includes a brief description of the impact of the Prophet of Islam’s personality on the world, and the importance of this issue in regard to contemporary world events. Contents of the paper include some discussion on proposed definitions of Islamic personality based on existing literature and conventional notions of personality via the field of psychology; the concept of moral character as the foundation of Islamic personality; the importance of Islamic knowledge and traditional notions of Islamic psychology; and some examples from the life of the Prophet himself as the primary model of Islamic personality. The paper is concluded by providing a summary of the proposed introductory concept of Islamic personality and its prominent features, along with recommendations for further development.

Introduction
The greatness of a man does not consist in the working of miracles or the doing of wonders; neither does it lie in the preaching of sermons or the formulating of theories. It lies in the possession of a mighty personality. Personality is one of the indescribable wonders of the world. It conciliates opposition and inspires respect and imitation, which results eventually in implicit obedience. It changes ideas and revolutionizes the thoughts, beliefs and actions of generations of the races of mankind.[i]
According to those familiar with his life both within and outside of the religion of Islam, the ideal human personality belonged to its Prophet, Muhammad bin Abdullah (peace and blessings of God be upon him), who was arguably able to achieve more in his 23 years of prophethood than any man in history. In fact, Michael Hart (1978) in 'The 100, A Ranking of the Most Influential Persons In History[ii],' said this about his life:
“My choice of Muhammad to lead the list of the world’s most influential persons may surprise some readers and may be questioned by others, but he was the only man in history who was supremely successful on both the secular and religious level. ...It is probable that the relative influence of Muhammad on Islam has been larger than the combined influence of Jesus Christ and St. Paul on Christianity. ...It is this unparalleled combination of secular and religious influence which I feel entitles Muhammad to be considered the most influential single figure in human history.”
In addition to his tangible triumphs, the impact he had on his followers and close companions was extraordinary. To his credit, he molded the character of his fellowmen, reformed them, changed their thoughts, put new ideas before them, elevated them to a higher plane, and, in spite of themselves, drove them onwards and upwards on the path of progress to the fullness of a better and holier life. For the first twelve years of his prophethood, the early Muslims suffered frightful persecution at the hands of idolaters, and yet their number steadily increased. Though its numbers were subjected to the cruelest of tortures, there were few apostates, and many converts to the faith of Islam. According to Muslims and non-Muslims alike, it was the personality and character of the Prophet that made Islam grow in the nascent period of its birth life.[iii] God, in the Qur’an, refers to the Prophet’s standard of human excellence as: “Certainly you have in the Messenger of God an excellent example for any who hopes in God and the Last Day and remembers God much.”[iv] According to Washington Irving in 'Life of Muhammad,'[v]:
“His military triumphs awakened no pride nor vainglory as they would have done had they been effected by selfish purposes. In the time of his greatest power he maintained the same simplicity of manner and appearance as in the days of his adversity. So far from affecting regal state, he was displeased if, on entering a room, any unusual testimonial of respect was shown to him.”

Furthermore, George Bernard Shaw[vi] says about him:
"He must be called the Saviour of Humanity. I believe that if a man like him were to assume the dictatorship of the modern world, he would succeed in solving its problems in a way that would bring it much needed peace and happiness.”
Mahatma Gandhi[vii], speaking on the character of Muhammad, says:
"I wanted to know the best of one who holds today's undisputed sway over the hearts of millions of mankind....I became more than convinced that it was not the sword that won a place for Islam in those days in the scheme of life. It was the rigid simplicity, the utter self-effacement of the Prophet, the scrupulous regard for his pledges, his intense devotion to his friends and followers, his intrepidity, his fearlessness, his absolute trust in God and in his own mission.”
Finally, Dr. Gustav Weil[viii] in 'History of the Islamic Peoples':
“Muhammad was a shining example to his people. His character was pure and stainless. His house, his dress, his food - they were characterized by a rare simplicity. So unpretentious was he that he would receive from his companions no special mark of reverence, nor would he accept any service from his slave that he could do for himself. He was accessible to all and at all times. He visited the sick and was full of sympathy for all. Unlimited was his benevolence and generosity as also was his anxious care for the welfare of the community.”

Indeed the perfection of morals, manners and character was, according to the Prophet himself, his foremost mission as the last Messenger of God. According to Abu Huraira, the Prophet said, "I have been sent only for the purpose of perfecting good morals (Al-Muwatta).” From the life of the Prophet and those of his closest companions to their followers and students, the sayings, stories and examples of the Prophet’s personality were safeguarded and passed down to help subsequent Muslims maintain his example for perfecting personality, conduct and morality for all time. Not only the important events of his life, but the record of his daily conduct, from birth to passing, is written with great detail on the pages of history. Many of his sayings, doings, actions and details of his conduct and character have been preserved. In short, his whole prophethood – at home, in the mosque and outside – was fully known to his companions, and was recorded as an open book so that the following generations could learn lessons and get inspiration from the primary example of Islamic personality.[ix]
The topic of Islamic personality, as exemplified by the Prophet, is a timely one. Currently, within the Islamic world, “the morality of Muslims is in a dubious condition. Their character has developed a number of defects, in consequence of which they have to face disruption, dislocation and the inevitable downfall.”[x] With the world engulfed in media reports of terrorism, sectarian violence, social ills, and other problems having to do with individual conduct and interpersonal relations, the need to re-acclimate to the teachings of the Prophet of Islam about human personality has never been greater. The planet is now comprised of over 1.2 billion Muslim men, women and children, representing almost one quarter of humanity. This community, based on sheer size alone, has the potential to do a great measure of good, or harm, depending on its overall condition and direction, of which basic human personality is an important ingredient.

Islam and Personality
Islam teaches its adherents that their role on earth is to be God’s khalifahs – deputies – and to carry out His commands for the welfare and benefit of all of mankind. Such a role relies heavily on the interpersonal conduct, behavior, character and morality of each and every individual Muslim, in essence, the “quality” of each personality. This is one of the foremost responsibilities of Muslims, following the example of the Prophet, to model good human relations. Thus, the need to focus on the drive toward self-perfection, reflected in the development of and striving for the prophetic personality, is a key aspect of the religion that has been all but forgotten in contemporary movements aimed at reviving the Sunnah of the Prophet.
Islamic personality is directly linked to the practice of Islam. Islam is a religion of action and a way of life that focuses on continuously working toward the ideal. It is not a mere identity or way in which one is identified. A Christian, for example, is one who ‘accepts Jesus Christ as their personal lord and savior.’ No work or effort is inherent in the term “Christianity,” nor does it imply action of any kind other than belief in the tenets that makes one a Christian. One who enters the fold of Islam, however, has entered a life based on “surrender” that requires constant effort in surrendering to God’s will and ongoing diligence in observing His commands. It is a lifestyle that is applied literally moment to moment, which is manifested through, impacts, and is affected by every aspect of one’s personality. 
To understand the development of a personality grounded in the Islamic religion, we must look toward the Holy Qur’an, the life and teachings of the Prophet Muhammad (Sunnah), as well as the works of Islamic scholars who, drawing from the Qur’an and Sunnah, have expounded on the notions of personality and human psychology according to the Islamic worldview.

Notions of Science and Psychology in the West
Each human personality is unique. In fact, personality is the sum total of all behavioral and mental characteristics by which an individual is recognized as being unique.[xi] In Islam, the Qur’an expounds in very clear terms a distinct concept of individual growth and development. A human being is body and soul, matter and spirit. It is the unique balance between these that makes humans uniquely what we are, which, according to Islamic belief, is the highest of all created beings.
It is this fundamental belief and assumption that draws a major distinction between the Islamic view on human personality and the Western-Secularist worldview, which tends to study man in a highly compartmentalized and reductionist fashion. The essential paradigms and methodologies of Western psychology, along with its overall view of man, are invariably materialist and secular. Modern psychology has played a significant role in shaping Western man and Western society. As part of the overall product of modernity, the Western worldview is, in effect, predominantly secular -- characterized by atheism, agnosticism, and humanism. In line with this worldview, the dominant trend in Western intellectualism is similarly materialistic and secular.[xii]
In contemporary psychology, contemporary man is treated and studied under the Western materialist purview. Thus, he is seen and studied fundamentally as a material being. The spiritual entity in him is either less recognized or simply dismissed completely. This dismissal of the spiritual component in man became necessary, however, because its presence cannot be established with the standards of rigid empiricism, which have come to hold sway over contemporary behavioral and social sciences.[xiii] As a result, in today’s psychology, the idea of a soul or spiritual nature is rarely acknowledged. Instead, within Western psychology, a fragmented view of man is presented. In trying to gain a deeper understanding of human nature, Western psychological theories, using a positivist scientific approach, have tended to focus on one aspect of the self (e.g., psychoanalysis focuses on the conscious/unconscious mind, cognitive psychology focuses on thoughts, and behavioral psychology focuses on human behavior). Although important achievements have been made, no model is truly comprehensive in itself in providing insight into the interplay between body, mind and soul, and the results of this interplay on human personality development. Given these major limitations in understanding the whole person, the questions of how much knowledge we really have of the self, and how deep an understanding of human personality we really have must be raised. Even very new, more integrated therapies that incorporate multiple schools of thought have proven limited, as they continue to ignore a dimension of the self that many regard as central to being human – the spiritual dimension.[xiv]

The materialistic age and the nature of modern psychological ailments has caused a re-awakening among social scientists who believe that the spiritual component of man is too vital to overlook in regard to human psychological and personality therapies. As a result, many scientists are recognizing the need to understand personality and human psychology from a more holistic perspective. Currently, this can be seen in such contemporary movements such as transpersonal psychology, which aims to directly incorporate a spiritual component to psychological counseling.[xv] With this trend, the Islamic worldview, embracing the Prophetic example, has never been more meaningful to Muslims and non-Muslims alike, as globalization and its atheistic-materialist values continue to add to the growing moral decay and declining social order among nations. To respond to this crisis of values, it is critical for humanity to broaden its investigation of human social behavior and undertake the study of human life in a way that is inclusive of all the dimensions that comprise our being. For it is the synthesis of these dimensions – body, mind and soul – that make us so complex, enigmatic and fascinating, and what ultimately shapes our individual personalities.

The Core of Islamic Personality – Moral Character
Among the many factors that influence personality, some are innate and some are learned (acquired). Acquired traits in a personality exert a powerful influence on human destiny – collective and individual. While a constructive behavioral attitude can propel human society to glory, a destructive personality can destroy the foundations of an entire civilization.[xvi]
Personality is the manifestation of our character in everything we do in life. According to Merriam-Webster (2001), personality is defined as “the complex of characteristics that distinguishes an individual or a nation or group; especially: the totality of an individual's behavioral and emotional characteristics.” Personality is how our basic character is displayed to the world. Imâm Abu Hamid Al-Ghazali, as it relates to the notion of personality, has elaborated the Islamic view on the importance of good character:
“Everything in the world has been created with a purpose. Man, being the most exalted of all creation, has a supreme purpose, which is to realize the moral through the proper exercise of the qualities inherent in him. He has to develop those qualities that facilitate moral progress and subjugate those which hinder it. In order to achieve the moral end one has to build a good character that comprises all the virtues, the most important of which is love of God. The actual worth of a virtue is essentially determined by the part it plays in helping man to achieve perfection whereby he attains nearness to God. Good character is the beauty of the soul, and like the beauty of the body it depends on the harmonious and proportionate development of all its elements.”[xvii]

From this description, moral character is not simply a goal within the life of a Muslim, but the end goal of the Islamic faith itself. On this matter, Prophet Muhammad was asked, “Which Muslim has the perfect faith?” He answered: “He who has the best moral character (Tibrani).” In another tradition, they asked the Prophet “What is the best thing given to man?” He replied, “moral character (Tirmidhi).”

In spite of the rapid expansion of his religion and the immense increase in their various tasks, Prophet Muhammad informed his followers of the fact that on the Day of Judgment there will be nothing weightier in their balance than their good moral character. According to Muhammad Al-Ghazali[xviii], “if religion is the name of good conduct between man and man, then on the other hand, in its spiritual sense, it is also the name of the best relationship between man and his God, and in both these aspects there is the same reality.” Al-Ghazali continues,
“There are many religions that give the glad tiding that you may embrace any belief and your sins will be washed away, and offering fixed prayers will cancel your mistakes. But Islam does not believe in this. According to it, these benefits will be available only when the axis and center of belief is a conscious step towards virtue and payment of the compulsory dues, and when the proposed worship can become the real source of washing away the sins and generating the real perfection. In other words, evil can be removed by those virtues that man makes his own and by which he is able to reach high and lofty standards. The Prophet of Islam very forcefully emphasized these valuable principles so that his followers may understand very clearly that the value of morality may not go down in its eyes and the importance of mere forms and shapes may not increase.”[xix]

Islamic personality, grounded in high moral character, encompasses beliefs, external traits, attributes, behaviors, manners and social graces, and adab. It covers every aspect of interpersonal life including relations between man and man, man and God, man and family, man and society, as well as man and the natural world. All of these are clearly reflected in the life stories of the Prophet, and are thoroughly documented in his seerah, or biography. Furthermore, there are volumes of accounts on the high moral conduct and personalities of his companions, and their followers from which we can draw many examples.

The ideal Islamic personality, as the saying attributed to the Prophet’s wife, A’isha, makes clear, is the personification of the Qur’an. That which is pleasing to God, should be pleasing to the Muslim and this should be borne out in every thought, word, and action. The Prophet, according to Muslims, reached this stage of human perfection because he was able to personify the Qur’an in this manner. As A’isha said, “He was pleased by what it (the Qur’an) finds pleasing and angry according to what it finds hateful.”[xx] Thus, in effect, the Prophet achieved actualization of the Divine Names and the highest and most refined character as a result of it.

From God’s messenger to the classical scholars, who throughout Islamic history have attempted to summarize the Islamic ideal in terms of personality, the notion of Islamic personality can be summed up by Imam Al-Ghazali’s description of “the godly man”:
“The godly man is wise, courageous and temperate in the noblest sense of the words, and in the highest degree. He engages in worship, prayers, fasting, alms-giving, and similar acts, but his duties to God do not exclude his duties to family, relatives, friends, neighbors, slaves, subjects and society as a whole. He must earn his livelihood by strictly honest means. He must cultivate the best manners for all occasions, namely, he should know how to carry himself best at the table, in society, while traveling, and at the gathering of godly people and avoid causing the slightest pain to his fellowmen on any account. The Prophet should be his ideal and his inspiration all through his life. Lastly, his duty is not only to reform and perfect all the aspects of his life but to reform his fellowmen as well. And the motive force behind a perfect life is nothing other than the love and fear of God.”[xxi]

From this description, the primary aspect of Islamic personality is one of dedication to God and His religion (Islam). As moral character is the very heart of Islamic personality, naturally, obedience and dedication to Allah and worship of him must play the primary role in such a life for the purpose of building fear and love of God. For according to Al-Ghazali, all good aspects of character flow from these two goals of man’s relationship with his creator.[xxii]
As personality goes beyond ingredients of good character and into other aspects of daily life, Al-Ghazali does not exclude man’s duties to his worldly life as being “godly,” and includes such mundane acts as earning one’s livelihood and table manners in his description. This inclusion of the “worldly as godly” is an important feature of Islam and one that separates it from other religions. Islam's uniqueness lies in spiritualizing the whole matrix of life. Every activity, whether related to things like prayer and fasting, or to economic transactions, sexual relationships, diplomatic dealings or scientific experimentation's, is religious if it is undertaken with God consciousness and accords with the values and principles revealed by Him; and it is irreligious if it is in violation of them. Activities related to matters of economy, politics and law, or of sex and social manners, are a part of man's religious behavior and do not fall outside its scope. Life is an organic whole and the same principles should guide and govern it in all its ramifications.[xxiii] Thus, the drive for self-perfection must include the whole of the Muslim’s everyday life, for nothing within it falls outside the scope of personality.

Al-Ghazali calls it a duty to avoid causing harm to his fellowmen. This is a critical feature of Islamic personality that stresses treating all creatures with compassion. This important feature of Islamic personality stems from the worldview of the oneness and Lordship of God above all his creation, of which humanity is the highest form. It reflects our duty to act justly toward all creatures, as only prescribed punishment and recompense for crimes against the laws of God are acceptable. As one of God’s names is “al-‘Adl,” or “the Just,” Muslims must always strive to act justly and dispense justice in our daily lives. The concept of justice in Islam also implies the need to balance the different aspects of the self as an important ingredient for healthy development of the personality.[xxiv] Justice is both an outcome of following the middle way in life’s activities and an important characteristic of the middle way of Islam. Adoption of the ‘middle way’ in the Islamic perspective is thus both a means and an aim of personality development and self-fulfillment. By taking the middle path we will achieve the ideal state and the ideal state itself is the middle, or balanced state.[xxv] Exhortation to seek a balance in satisfying both body and soul is found in the Qur’an: “But seek the abode of the hereafter in that which God has given you and neglect not your portion of the world, and be kind even as God has been kind to you and seek not corruption in the Earth….”[xxvi]

Imam Al-Ghazali concludes his description of the godly man with the all-encompassing statement that “his duty is not only to reform and perfect all the aspects of his life but to reform his fellowmen as well.” This is not only alluding to the concepts of self-perfection and struggle, but as well “commanding the proper and forbidding the improper (amr bi al ma'ruf wa nahi 'an al munkar),” which is one of the most important principles in all of Islam, as it is stressed repeatedly in both the Qur’an and sayings (hadith) of the Prophet.[xxvii] The constant concern of the Muslim with promoting what is good and just, and actively dissuading what is wrong and unlawful according to God is a very important characteristic of Islamic personality. Such a preoccupancy implies that the Muslim is always concerned with promoting the positive values represented by Islam within himself and the controllable world around him. If a Muslim is to ignore this principle and in the face of wrong not react in any way, then this means that in a spiritual and moral sense he is dead.[xxviii] This point is made in a well known saying (hadith) of the Prophet in which he is reported to have said:  "If one of you sees something wrong, let him change it with his hand; if he cannot, then with his tongue; if he cannot, then with his heart and this is the weakest faith (Muslim)."

In addition to Imam Al-Ghazali’s description of the “godly man,” there are many scholarly treatments on this topic. Even though the Prophet Muhammad is the greatest and most brilliant example of it, there is no one definition of Islamic personality, and different scholars throughout Islamic history have pointed to different examples of the Prophet’s life and the lives of his companions to illustrate this point. For example, Muhammad Al-Ghazali, in his book “Muslim’s Character (1996),” breaks down his notion of Islamic character into several categories including: Pillars of Islam and moral values; truth; trust and honesty; fulfillment of promise; sincerity; etiquette of conversation; keep your bosom (heart) free from rancor and enmity; strength; tolerance and pardon; philanthropy and benevolence; patience; economy and moderation; purity and neatness; modesty; brotherhood; unity and collectivism; selection of friends; imposing and awe-inspiring; kindness; learning and intellect; and full utilization of time.[xxix] Personality can be described as the manifestation of one’s basic character into actions, thoughts and words.  As such, the two are closely linked.

As many world religions stress the importance of their unique beliefs, perhaps in Islam more than any other is the focus on the actualization of belief, or the application of religious knowledge in every aspect of life. Such application translates into individual conduct, which is exhibited through individual personality. Thus, the development of Islamic personality is a critical end to the religion, and greatly influenced by one’s education and indoctrination into it, as well as many other factors.

Islamic Knowledge and Psychology
Human personality in the Islamic tradition, unlike the Western psychological tradition, is understood through the total makeup of the human being – body, mind and soul. According to Islamic tradition, to understand the overall psychological nature of man and his personality development, one must understand the inner workings, the essence, of the whole person as well as the importance and role of knowledge.
From the Islamic perspective, knowledge is of two types: “revealed” Divine knowledge and ‘worldly’ knowledge. Divine knowledge is intuitive, subjectively experienced and has the potential to transform individuals. ‘Worldly’ knowledge is what is generally considered to be “objective” and is experienced more as a process of acquiring information about the external world.[xxx] They differ greatly in their actualization. For example, in today’s universities, students may acquire massive amounts of information but many still graduate with differences only in age and perceived professional status, not necessarily as more perfected human beings. Divine knowledge, however, has the ability to completely transform human beings, as it did with the Prophet of Islam, his companions, followers, and generations of Muslims since. Thus, an increase in material knowledge resulting in a greater amount of “information” does not necessarily lead to the “transformation” of the self. Divine knowledge and material knowledge are not necessarily contradictory, however, they simply reflect the co-existence of two different (but not opposing) dimensions: the spiritual dimension and the physical dimension.[xxxi]
In Islamic thought, the human being is considered to be the meeting point of these two different dimensions. The Arabic word for such a meeting is barzakh, or “interspace.” In light of this Islamic perspective, efforts to gain an understanding of the self require a study of its entirety. Knowledge of the self, and what it means to be human in modern times, however, has become less of the domain of religion as the domain of the field of psychology, despite that the word “psychology” is actually based on the Greek word “psyche”, meaning “soul,” or “spirit.” Psychology then, in actuality, means the study of the soul, not simply the study of mind and behavior, and thus implies a natural fit with the religious sciences.[xxxii]
According to the Qur’an, all psychological phenomena originate in the Self. The Self is the essence of man, and is often referred to by one of four terms in Arabic -- qalb (heart), ruh (soul), nafs (desire-nature), and ‘aql (intellect/reason).[xxxiii] Each of these signifies a spiritual entity. Thus, according to Islam, the essence of a person is the Self, which is a spiritual entity, not a physical one. In the Qur’an, personality and behavior are referred to as the nafs, which the Qur’an has used to describe several states of the Self: nafs ammarah (tendency to evil, 12:53); nafs lawwamah (conscience and concern with moral rectitude, 75:2); nafs mulhamah (inspired to piety and God-consciousness); nafs qanu’ah (satisfied with what it has); nafs mutma’inna (calm and tranquil, 89:27); nafs radhiyah (appreciative, 89:27-28); nafs mardhiyyat (appreciated, 89:27-28); and nafs kamilah (perfect).[xxxiv] Islamic scholars typically highlight the three most commonly referred to states of the Self in the Qur’an as: nafs ammarah; nafs lawwamah; and nafs mutma’inna: 

Nafs Ammara (the commanding or lower Self) - Qur’an 12:53.  This self is prone to the lower aspects of the Self, representing the negative drives in man.  It can be viewed as analogous to the Freudian concept of ‘id’ e.g. ‘I want to do it now… I don’t care if it’s right or wrong.’
Nafs Lawwama (The self-reproaching Self) - Qur’an 75:2.  This state corresponds to the Self when it becomes aware of wrong- doing and feels remorse.  A parallel between the Freudian concept of ‘superego’ and nafs lawwama may be drawn. The feeling of “I shouldn’t have done that” or “why did I do that – I wish I hadn’t…” 
Nafs Mutma’innah (The peaceful Self) - Qur’an 89:27-28.  This is the state of inner peace and happiness, when you feel satisfied and content in yourself. This is the state that we are aiming to achieve. In order to achieve the state of tranquility and peace one has to activate the remorseful self (e.g. through sincere repentance) and control the lower commanding self (through self discipline).[xxxv]

The state of the Self is dependent on many different faculties and powers at play within the individual. Thus, the Qur’anic personality is impacted by a variety of factors including: biological inheritance, physical environment, culture, socialization, group experience, and unique individual experiences.[xxxvi]  Far from the simple dichotomy of “nature or nurture” as is so prominent in traditional Western psychological thought, the Islamic notion of personality development is a more complex one, that is directly linked to the state and health of the individual Self.
According to Islam, man is born in a natural state of purity (fitrat al Islam). (Incidentally, this is in direct contrast to Judeo-Christian tradition that purports that man is born in a state of “original sin.”) All of creation comes into existence in this state of fitrah:He Who has made everything which He has created most good: He began the creation of man with (nothing more than) clay.”[xxxvii] Unlike other forms of creation, however, human beings have within them the ability to leave this state of nature into something unnatural.[xxxviii] This potential to do what is unnatural and harmful to the Self is based on mankind’s free will. Thus, in order to actualize fitrah, or to return to the natural state of purity, man must gain control over the potential for wrong within him. Taking advantage of free will, through the use of the intellect man can apply revelation in choosing what is right and thus reawaken the recognition of fitrah in him. Although man is not born evil, he is vulnerable to evil stimuli or external sources of misguidance. This property of the human constitution, to be vulnerable to wrong, is intrinsic to man.[xxxix] The emotional and biological impulses of man are not inherently evil, but are readily susceptible to such evil stimuli. Thus, they need to be controlled and directed in accordance with divinely prescribed laws so that the Self (nafs) can be transformed into the highest level of spiritual achievement.[xl]
Human personality, therefore, is dependent upon the psychological or psychical implications of fitrah that occur within the Self. Since emotions and desires form an integral part of man, the psychological implications are directly related to his emotional dimensions. Both the emotional and the psychological dimensions have positive as well as negative tendencies. If man’s emotions are controlled and directed to higher spiritual ends, then his psychical nature is disciplined. Although the biological constitution of man is completely different from the psychological constitution, the former nevertheless serves as an instrument for the drives of the psyche. The lower Self – comprised of our animalistic desires, passions, etc. – must be transformed into a positive, spiritually higher state so that the individual may be liberated from bondage to the lower Self, for it tends towards gratification of the biological and emotional needs of the individual and away from the service of God.[xli]
In terms of human development, according to Islamic thought it is the early environment that determines how these potentials are enhanced. If the environment is good, the good potentials are promoted. If it is bad, the bad ones are.[xlii] Thus, personal characteristics are set quite early in life according to Islamic thought. In fact, if some verses of the Qur’an and prophetic traditions are studied closely, it will be discovered that Islam has great concern regarding the formative periods of phases in the life cycle. They lay the foundation upon which later development builds. In this respect the entire prenatal, infancy, childhood, and adolescent periods can all be considered sensitive in regard to the impact on the personality of the individual throughout his or her lifespan.[xliii] Although aspects of the personality can change during life and a person has the capacity to overcome many disabilities in the basic personality, the basic personality itself cannot change. This is because the personality itself refers to the permanent within man – his rational soul.[xliv] Behavior, however, does not always reflect the permanent character and can change. It is this capacity for self-improvement, taking charge, and striving for the best that makes humans morally responsible.[xlv]
Islamic personality does not solely refer to man’s attributes, but the balance of powers, passions, and principles within the Self that facilitate the cultivation and development of such attributes. A goal in Islamic personality development, therefore, is to arrive at the right balance within the Self that can bring it to a harmonious state. This can only occur through adherence to God’s guidance – obedience to His commands and incorporating the ways (Sunnah) of the Prophet into our daily lives.

The Prophet Muhammad – The Example of Islamic Personality
History is filled with biographies of people who are considered ‘great’ in terms of their accomplishments. Many earned this status based on achievements in the their respective fields, for their military conquests, for their visionary policies, for their discoveries, or for their charisma and leadership. Very few, however, have earned such regard based on their pure character and the impact they had on improving morality and conduct of so many in such a short period of time like the Prophet of Islam. In addition, no other human being in history was capable of achieving what the Prophet achieved in both the earthly and spiritual realms.
From the Prophetic example, we can begin to understand and define the beliefs, behaviors, and attributes comprising the Islamic personality. Unlike other models and concepts of personality, which rarely provide a human example from which to draw, the Islamic notion of ideal personality is based on the life and actions of the Prophet of Islam himself, and from him further examples can be drawn from his closest companions and exceptional Muslims throughout history. In the Qur’an, God makes clear the standard of character of the Messenger in the words: "And you (Muhammad) stand on an exalted standard of character".[xlvi] As the Qur’an is, to Muslims, the literal word of God as told to the Prophet through Archangel Gabriel, Muhammad is seen by Muslims as the full personification of the Qur’an, and consequently, the will of God. As mentioned earlier, the Prophet’s own wife, A’isha, labeled him “the walking Qur’an”, in that he completely personified its laws and principles.[xlvii]

The Prophet of Islam taught the importance of developing moral character through his everyday actions in all aspects of life, which was manifested through his personality. Through his example, we learn that mere teachings and commands of ‘Do’s’ and ‘Don’ts’ do not form the foundation of good moral character and personality in a society, because these things alone are not sufficient for developing good qualities in human nature. The teaching of good conduct, which is fruitful, requires long training and constant watchfulness.[xlviii] Such training cannot be on the right lines if the example before the society is not such that commands full confidence, because a person having a bad moral character cannot leave a good impression on his surroundings. The best training can be expected only from such a man whose character, by the force of its morality, would create a sense of admiration in the beholders. They would sing praises of his nobility and feel the irresistible urge to benefit from the example of his life. The world would spontaneously feel the urge to follow his footsteps, as was the case with the Prophet.[xlix]

Prophet Muhammad, according to Muslims, was the example of good moral character and personality. Before advising his followers to adopt a moral life by giving sermons and counsels, he was sowing the seeds of morality among his followers by actually living such a life.[l] Some examples of his words and deeds to this effect follow:
§    Abdullah Ibn Amar says: “The Messenger of Allah (saw) was neither ill-mannered nor rude. He used to say that the better people among you are those who are best in their moral character (Bukhari).”
§    Anas says: “I served the holy Prophet for ten years. He never said “Uf” (expressing dissatisfaction), nor did he ever ask me why I did this or did not do that (Muslim).”
§    It is also reported by him: “My mother used to hold the Prophet’s hand and used to take him wherever she wanted. If any person used to come before him and shake his hand, the Prophet never used to draw away his hand from the other person’s hands till the latter drew away his hands, and he never used to turn away his face from that person till the latter himself turned away his face. And in the meetings he was never seen squatting in such a way that his knees were protruding further than his fellow squatters (Tirmidhi).”
§     Hazrat A’isha says: “If there were two alternatives, the holy Prophet used to adopt the easiest alternative, provided there was no sin in it. If that work were sinful, then he used to run away farthest from it. The Prophet did not take any personal revenge from any body. Yes, if Allah’s command were to be disobeyed, then his wrath was to be stirred. Allah’s Messenger did not beat anybody with his own hands, neither his wife nor a servant. Yes, he used to fight in the wars in the cause of Allah (Muslim).”
§     Anas has narrated: “I was walking with the Prophet. He had wrapped a thick chadar round his body. One Arab pulled the chadar so forcefully that a part of his shoulder could be seen by me, and I was perturbed by this forcing pulling of the chadar. The Arab then said: ‘Oh Muhammad! Give me some of my share from the property which Allah has given you.’ The Prophet turned towards him and laughed, and gave orders for a donation being given to him (Bukhari).”
§     Abdullah bin Harith has reported that he did not see anybody smiling more than the Messenger of Allah (Tirmidhi).
§     Hazrat A’isha was asked what did the Prophet do at home? She replied: “He used to be in the service of his home people; and when the time of prayer came he used to perform ablutions and go out for prayer (Muslim).”
§    Anas has narrated: “Allah’s Messenger had the best manners of all the persons. I had an adopted brother, whose name was Abu Umair. He had a sick sparrow, who was called ‘Nagheer.’ Allah’s Messenger used to be playful with him and ask him: ‘O Abu Umair! What has happened to your Nagheer (Bukhari)’.”
§    Qazi A’yaz says that the Prophet was the most excellent-mannered, most philanthropic and the bravest of all. One night the people of Medina were terribly frightened. Some people proceeded towards the sound (which was probably the cause). They saw that the Prophet was coming from that direction. He had rushed before all others to find out what was the trouble. He was riding the horse of Abu Talha, without a saddle, and a sword was hanging from his neck, and he was comforting the people not to be afraid saying there was nothing to worry.[li]
§    Once he (the Prophet) received seventy thousand dirhams. They were placed before him on the mat. He distributed them standing. He did not refuse a single beggar till he finished the entire amount.[lii]
§    Jarir bin Abdullah says: “Since the time I became a Muslim, the Prophet did not prevent me from entering (the house); whenever he looked at me, he smiled.”[liii]

As can be seen from his words and deeds, recorded and told by his companions and followers, the Prophet of Islam was an example personality. In every facet of life, he epitomized the principles of Islam and the Divine Names of God as put forth in the Qur’an. According to Islamic belief, all of the prophets of God are manifestations of the Divine Unity and Perfection, but Muhammad is its supreme manifestation. His name is the most exalted of the Divine Names, containing all the Names within it. Thus, Muhammad is the spiritual incarnation and manifestation of all of God's Names, and thus the most perfected human being and personality.[liv]

There are literally thousands of examples from the Prophet’s life pertaining to his personality that highlight, in intricate detail, his behaviors, manners, thoughts, and beliefs. What is common among all accounts of the Prophet’s life, however varied they may be, is that nothing the Prophet did in his daily life was outside the realm of the observable personality, nor insignificant from a religious perspective. Every human interaction, every meal taken, every sermon given, every battle fought, every charity performed, had a lesson in the importance of Islamic personality. Thus, it was not only what the Prophet did that mattered, but how he did it. This is one of several reasons why Allah distinguished him in the Qur’an as “a mercy to all the worlds.”[lv] For in even the most mundane of actions is a lesson for those who attempt to follow his way of life.

This all-inclusiveness of the Prophet’s way (Sunnah) as a guide points to the notion of Islam as a complete system of life, and the importance of infusing God-consciousness (taqwa) into daily living -- “Those who believed, and whose hearts find rest in the remembrance of God: verily, in the remembrance of God do hearts find rest.”[lvi] In doing so, the Prophet showed why the perfection of personality is not only an aspect of religion, but the very goal of religion itself. For through attainment of such a standard of personality, individual success in both this life and the life to come, in addition to a society based on moral rectitude, mercy, and justice, can be achieved.

Conclusion
With this paper an attempt has been made to extend a concept and initial understanding of Islamic personality. By highlighting the origins and nature of personality theory in western models, an attempt was first made to illustrate the basic differences between them and the Islamic notion of personality, as well as fundamental differences within its parent field, psychology. In an attempt to provide an understanding of the foundation of Islamic personality, the article next explored the idea of moral character and its role in the forming of personality. Citing classical and contemporary scholarly works, the article then attempted to provide a brief look into the existing literature on Islamic notions of psychology, and particularly the Qur’anic understanding of the Self as the fountainhead for all psychological phenomena. Finally, the notion of Islamic personality was explored using the real-life example of the Prophet of Islam as the perfect model of
such a personality.
The topic of personality from the Islamic perspective is a critical area in which Muslim social scientists and educators must delve, especially as we attempt to understand our shortcomings as a community, and strive to improve relations and conduct between people throughout the world at large. Personality development, especially as it relates to youth, must become an issue of the highest priority. The challenges facing the younger generations are enormous, regardless as to whether they are from east or west, rich or poor, or Muslim or non-Muslim backgrounds. A combination of factors is hard at work pressing for their developmental failure and the perpetuation of social ills, self-destruction and spiritual decay. For Muslim youth in particular, this reality is even more severe. Thus, not only teaching but modeling Islamic personality is critical in order for youth to internalize what it means to live every aspect of life with God-consciousness and piety (taqwa). In order to engage in this work of personality development, however, we must first understand that personality can and must be Islamic for Islam to be the foundation for success of the Muslims.


References
[i] Anonymous. 2000. The ideal personality of sayyidina wa maulana Muhammad (SAS).  Retrieved November 14, 2001 from: http://www.geocities.com/~abdulwahid//muslimarticles/index.html.
[ii] Hart, M.H. 1978. The 100: A ranking of the most influential persons in history. New York: Hart Publishing Company, Inc., p. 33.
[iii] Anonymous.  The ideal personality.
[iv] Ali, A.Y. 1989. The Holy Qur’an: Text, Translation and Commentary. Beltville, MD: Amana Corporation, 33:21. 
[v] Irving, W. 1920. Life of Muhammad. London. Retrieved October 4, 2001 from: http://www.themodernreligion.com/quotes_muhammad.htm#irving1.  
[vi] Shaw, G.B. 1936. The genuine Islam. V. 1, No. 8. Singapore. Retrieved October 4, 2001 from: http://www.themodernreligion.com/quotes_muhammad.htm#shaw. 
[vii] Gandhi, M. 1924. Young India. Madras. Retrieved October 4, 2001 from: http://www.themodernreligion.com/quotes_muhammad.htm#gandhi.  
[viii] Khuda Bukhsh, S., 1914.  A history of the Islamic peoples, translated from the German of Dr. Gustav Weil’s Geschichte der Islamitischen Volker. University of Calcutta, p. 27.
[ix] Anonymous.  The ideal personality.
[x] Al-Ghazali, M. 1996. Muslim’s character. Dawah Book Center: Bombay, p. vii.
[xi] Mateen, M.T. 2000. Building a successful personality. Retrieved October 25, 2001 from: http://www.whyislam.org/aa/adha01/index.asp?article_id=4.
[xii] Shehu, S. 1997. Towards an Islamic perspective of developmental psychology. American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences, 14: 2. Retrieved October 27, 2001 from: http://www.islam-online.net/iol-English/qadaya/psychology-2/psychology1.asp. 
[xiii] Ibid.
[xiv] Yaaqob, S. 2000. Towards Islamic psychology. Presented at ‘International Conference on Muslim Women in Science: A Better Future’ Fez, Morocco, March 22-24; Organized by The Royal Academy of Science International Trust (RASIT) and The Islamic Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization (ISESCO). Retrieved November 5, 2001 from:  http://www.crescentlife.com/articles/toward_islamic_psychology.htm.  
[xv] Strohl, J.E. 1998. Transpersonalism: Ego meets soul. Journal of Counseling & Development, 76:4, p. 397.
[xvi] Mateen, M.T. Building a successful personality.  
[xvii] Umaruddin, M. 1991. The ethical philosophy of Al-Ghazali. Sh. Muhammad Ashraf  Publishers: Lahore, p. 163.  
[xviii] Al-Ghazali, M., p. 15.
[xix] Ibid., p. 16.
[xx] Al-Hawfi, A.M. 1996. Portrait of human perfection. Dar Al Taqwa: London, p. 33.
[xxi] Umaruddin, M., p. 182.
[xxii] Ibid., p. 172.
[xxiii] Ahmad, K. (2000). Islam: Basic principles and characteristics. Retrieved September 13, 2000 from: http://www.iad.org/books/IPC.html.
[xxiv] Yaaqob, S. Towards Islamic psychology.
[xxv] Ibid.
[xxvi] Ali, A.Y., 28:77. 
[xxvii] Shafaat, A. 1987. Commanding good and forbidding evil. Retrieved on November 25, 2001 from: http://www.geocities.com/alummah2000/CommandingGood.html.
[xxviii] Ibid.
[xxix] Al-Ghazali, M., p. Table of Contents.
[xxx] Yaaqob, S. Towards Islamic psychology.
[xxxi] Ibid.
[xxxii] Ibid.
[xxxiii] Umaruddin, M., p. 71.
[xxxiv] Kasule, O.H. 2001. Psychology and mental health. Retrieved September 18, 2001 from: http://www.iiu.edu.my/medic/islmed/index.html.
[xxxv] Yaaqob, S. Towards Islamic psychology.
[xxxvi] Kasule, O.H. Psychology and mental health. 
[xxxvii] Ali, A.Y., 32:7. 
[xxxviii] Adibudeen, T. 2001. Human development and provisions for the hereafter. Retrieved October 5, 2001 from: http://www.1ummah.org/articles/human_development.htm.
[xxxix] Mohamed, Y. 1996. The psychological implication of fitrah. Adapted from: Fitra: the Islamic concept of human nature. Ta-Ha Publishers: London. Retrieved November 3, 2001 from: http://www.angelfire.com/al/islamicpsychology/fitrah/psychimpl.html.
[xl] Ibid. 
[xli] Ibid. 
[xlii] Kasule, O.H. Psychology and mental health. 
[xliii] Shehu, S. Towards an Islamic perspective.
[xliv] Al-Attas, S.M.N. 1978. Islam and secularism. Art Printing Works Sdn. Bhd.: Kuala Lumpur, p.152.
[xlv] Kasule, O.H. Psychology and mental health. 
[xlvi] Ali, A.Y., 68:4. 
[xlvii] Al-Hawfi, A.M., p. 33.
[xlviii] Al-Ghazali, M., p. 17.
[xlix] Ibid, p. 18.
[l] Ibid.
[li] Ibid, p. 21.
[lii] Ibid, p. 22.
[liii] Ibid, p. 23.
[liv] Al-Muttaqi, A. 1958. Kanz-al-ummal. Hyderabad. Retrieved November 24, 2001 from: http://home4.pacific.net.sg/~makhdoom/seekers.html.
[lv] Ali, A.Y., 21:107. 
[lvi] Ibid, 13:28. 
 
About the Author:
Abdul-Lateef Abdullah (Steven Krauss)
  abd_lateef@hotmail.com
The author is an American Ph.D. student currently studying at the Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM) in the field of Youth Studies. His research area of interest is the development of Islamic personality among Muslim youth. He is a recent (1999) convert to Islam and spends much time writing about his experiences as a Muslim-American convert.

published in www.crescentlife.com